Questioning Everything Propaganda
Originally published May 23rd, 2025
The safety of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (Pfizer and Moderna) has been a cornerstone of mainstream public health messaging, yet alternative voices on platforms like Substack and X challenge this narrative with disturbing reports. For my blog, dedicated to exposing propaganda and seeking truth, this article investigates claims about white fibrous clots and alleged VAERS data manipulation, framing them as urgent calls for transparency and independent scrutiny. Laura Kasner’s March 2025 Substack post, “A Horrifying Breakthrough in the WHITE FIBROUS CLOT Saga,” details a scientific team’s analysis of unusual clots, while WelcomeTheEagle’s Substack alleges systemic VAERS manipulation. These dual concerns suggest a potential public health crisis obscured by institutional propaganda, demanding rigorous investigation to separate fact from distortion.
A team led by retired organic chemist Greg Harrison, building on 2022 Inductively Coupled Plasma – Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) tests by Mike Adams, analyzed white fibrous clots provided by embalmer Richard Hirschman. Their findings, reportedly verified by two labs, include:
A Substack post by The Focal Points suggests additional tests (Raman spectroscopy, Thioflavin T fluorescence) indicate amyloid-like structures, hinting at protein-based anomalies. These white, fibrous, elastic clots differ from red, blood-based thrombi, raising questions about their origin. The high phosphorus and tin levels suggest a possible external trigger, potentially linked to vaccine components, though contamination remains unconfirmed without transparent protocols. These findings challenge mainstream assurances of vaccine safety, which often dismiss such anomalies as normal or unrelated, a hallmark of institutional propaganda.
Kasner’s article claims mRNA vaccines contain vast numbers of phospholipid nanoparticles, with phosphates and sulfates in lipids like ALC-0315 and ALC-0159 potentially driving clot formation. While the nanoparticle count is likely overstated (estimates suggest billions per vial, not quintillions), the presence of phosphorus and sulfur in lipid nanoparticles is factual. X posts by users like @VaccineTruths and @ClotWatch speculate that nanoparticles or the spike protein could disrupt vascular or immune function, though no direct evidence links them to fibrous clots. A Substack by The Forgotten Side of Medicine highlights the lack of long-term studies on nanoparticle persistence, fueling concerns about unforeseen effects obscured by mainstream narratives.
Kasner references “White Clot Syndrome” from the 1970s–1980s, linked to Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), where Heparin triggered immune-mediated, platelet-rich white clots. While HIT clots differ from the reported fibrous structures, the analogy suggests medical interventions can cause rare clotting phenomena, a precedent ignored by mainstream vaccine safety claims. This historical parallel underscores the need to question sanitized narratives and investigate potential vaccine-related harms.
Embalmers like Richard Hirschman and John O’Looney report finding white fibrous clots since 2021. Hirschman’s X post, cited in Kasner’s Substack, garnered over 20 million views before alleged suppression. O’Looney’s video shows a fibrous clot removed from a patient’s neck, described as unprecedented in decades of embalming. Tom Haviland’s 2024 Worldwide Embalmer Survey, conducted with 154 embalmers, found 83% reporting white fibrous clots in 27.5% of bodies since 2021, a sharp rise from pre-vaccine years. The consistency of these reports across countries, as documented in Clotastrophe, challenges mainstream dismissals and suggests a phenomenon suppressed by institutional propaganda, warranting urgent investigation.
WelcomeTheEagle’s Substack, a critical resource for exposing data manipulation, alleges systemic issues in VAERS beyond its known underreporting (estimated at 1–10% of adverse events). These claims suggest deliberate efforts to obscure vaccine-related harms, aligning with my blog’s mission to combat propaganda through evidence-based scrutiny.
In “VAERS New Data Update Published July 5th,” WelcomeTheEagle reports that 44 reports were deleted in a single month, with 43% involving serious outcomes (death, permanent disability, hospitalization, ER visits), disproportionate to the 30% serious event rate in live data. This suggests selective targeting of severe cases, as noted: “They clearly go after the serious events and serious symptoms slowly erasing the severity knowing you won’t notice.” A “Deleted Reports Dashboard” tracks these removals, a unique tool for exposing data suppression.
In “More Proof VAERS Does Not Publish All Legitimate Reports,” analysis of Temporary ID vs. Finalized ID shows reports being withheld or altered before publication, with some reappearing years later with different details (e.g., victim, vaccine type, or date swapped, as in ID# 1545028). X posts by @welcometheeagle, such as one on May 21, 2025, claim VAERS hides signals like myocarditis in follow-up data, supported by dashboards at vaersaware.com.
WelcomeTheEagle highlights undercoding of serious conditions—e.g., vitreous detachment, pulmonary hemorrhage, and retinal detachment logged as mere office visits—minimizing their severity. The July 5th update notes hidden ages and RSV injuries, further obscuring signals. A 2023 post, “VAERS Gets Exposed By WelcomeTheEagle On CHD.TV,” argues VAERS fails to correct unpopulated fields during vetting, alleging “intelligent evil design” to suppress data, with manufacturers and government failing obligations under the 1986 Vaccine Act.
In “General Dynamics and VAERS Retrospectively Exposed Again,” WelcomeTheEagle disputes claims by General Dynamics (GDIT), a VAERS contractor, that backlogs were cleared by May 2021. Analysis shows no reports with vaccination dates after April 6, 2023, despite later submissions, suggesting “throttling” of data. The post questions why VAERS cannot trace report origins (e.g., via IP addresses or fax area codes), calling these “carnival tricks.” X posts, like @welcometheeagle’s on May 17, 2025, claim VAERS is used to “run cover for big pharma,” reinforcing suspicions of institutional propaganda.
The alleged manipulation directly impacts the ability to detect signals like white fibrous clots. If severe adverse events are deleted, undercoded, or withheld, reports of clots or related symptoms (e.g., thrombosis, vascular anomalies) could be systematically suppressed. The lack of an interactive VAERS dashboard, as demanded by WelcomeTheEagle, limits public access to raw data, aligning with my blog’s call for transparency to counter institutional cover-ups.
X Sentiment: Posts reflect deep distrust in VAERS and vaccine safety narratives. @welcometheeagle’s May 21, 2025, post cites agreement with Dr. Peter McCullough that VAERS undergoes “huge data manipulation and curation,” with RFK Jr. acknowledging unpublished legitimate reports. Users like @DataSkeptic and @TruthSeekerMD amplify WelcomeTheEagle’s dashboards, while @deonandan’s December 17, 2024, post cautions that VAERS’s unverified nature limits its reliability—a point countered by WelcomeTheEagle’s focus on deliberate manipulation.
Substack Community: Kasner’s Clotastrophe collaborates with Haviland and Jenna McCarthy, building on the 2022 film Died Suddenly. Authors like Dr. Pierre Kory highlight VAERS underreporting, while The Forgotten Side of Medicine questions the lack of nanoparticle safety studies. Comments from users like Joy Lucette Garner and Deanna Kline praise WelcomeTheEagle’s exposure of VAERS issues, noting disappeared case reports.
Independent Platforms: WelcomeTheEagle’s vaersaware.com provides dashboards like the “Deleted Reports Dashboard” and Moderna/Pfizer lot analyses, cited in “EXCLUSIVE: ICAN OBTAINS CRITICAL MODERNA COVID-19 VACCINE LOT INFORMATION.” These tools reveal patterns of data suppression not visible in public VAERS interfaces like medalerts.org or openvaers.com.
The mainstream insists mRNA vaccines are safe, dismissing clotting risks beyond rare vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) tied to adenovirus vaccines. This narrative labels embalmer reports and VAERS concerns as misinformation without investigation, a classic propaganda tactic to silence dissent. WelcomeTheEagle’s evidence of deleted reports, undercoding, and throttling suggests VAERS is actively manipulated, not merely flawed, potentially concealing signals like fibrous clots. The lack of long-term nanoparticle studies and autopsies on fibrous clots, as noted in Clotastrophe, further erodes trust in mainstream assurances, aligning with my blog’s mission to challenge institutional narratives.
The white fibrous clot claims and VAERS manipulation allegations are preliminary but critical:
Gaps remain:
These findings, while not conclusive, are too alarming to dismiss, demanding action to counter potential propaganda obscuring a public health crisis.
To combat propaganda and seek truth, immediate steps are needed:
The white fibrous clots reported by embalmers and the alleged VAERS data manipulation exposed by WelcomeTheEagle raise profound questions about mRNA vaccine safety and institutional transparency. The clots’ unusual composition and post-2021 surge, combined with evidence of VAERS deleting serious reports and undercoding symptoms, suggest a potential crisis obscured by propaganda. While preliminary, these findings demand independent investigation to counter mainstream dismissals. My blog is committed to amplifying these concerns, encouraging readers to follow Substack and X updates, engage with healthcare providers, and advocate for rigorous, transparent research to uncover the truth about these clots and VAERS’s role in concealing it.